Ancient Book of Mark found not to be so ancient after all

Published on December 17th, 2009 | by Admin


A biblical expert has found that an ancient Book of Mark kept at the University of Chicago is actually a relatively modern fake.

Scholars have argued for nearly 70 years over the provenance of what’s called the Archaic Mark, a 44-page miniature book, known as a “codex,” which contains the complete 16-chapter text of the Gospel of Mark in minuscule handwritten text. The manuscript, which also includes 16 colorful illustrations, has long been believed to be either an important witness to the early text of the gospel or a modern forgery, said Mitchell, Professor of New Testament and Early Christian Literature.

“The mystery is now solved from textual, chemical, and codicological (bookmaking) angles,” said Mitchell, who first became intrigued by the codex when she saw it as a graduate student in 1982. Comprehensive analysis demonstrates that it is not a genuine Byzantine manuscript, but a counterfeit, she said, “made somewhere between 1874 and the first decades of the 20th century.”

[Full story]

Tags: , , , , , ,

4 Responses to Ancient Book of Mark found not to be so ancient after all

  1. It seems like a lot of Christianity is based upon erroneous popular assumptions.

  2. How do you derive that assumption from this article?

  3. fenifur says:

    Well, this does remind me of the Time Team episode where they tested some saint’s relics and found them to be a mix of butchered animals… the church still kept them though, and basically implied Time Team were lying… that’s delusional faith for you hehe!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Follow me on Twitter!   Subscribe to my RSS feed!
  • Question of the Moment

    "Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them." - Albert Einstein

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Sponsors

  • Archives