You are here
Home > All > Christopher Columbus did not spread syphilis

Christopher Columbus did not spread syphilis

The story that Christopher Columbus brought syphilis back to Europe from the New World has been proven false.

It’s been popularly theorized among experts in tropical diseases that the explorer brought back one too many treasures from the New World, including the potentially fatal sexually transmitted infection. Soon after his return in the mid-1490s, a pandemic of the disease erupted in Europe.

However, the largest excavation of skeletons undertaken in Britain has unearthed seven that suggest the disease was known in England up to two centuries before that.

Archaeologists believe that rough patches on the skulls and limbs of skeletons found at St Mary Spital in East London exonerate Columbus’s crew.

Brian Connell, an osteologist for the Museum of London who studied the bones, said he had no doubt that the skeletons were buried before Columbus’ voyage. Radiocarbon dating of the samples is estimated to be 95 percent accurate.

“We’re confident that Christopher Columbus is simply not a feature of the emergence and timing of the disease in Europe,” Connell said.

[Full story]

3 thoughts on “Christopher Columbus did not spread syphilis

  1. This nonsense article is defending Columbus from spreading syphilis TO EUROPE. He spread it FROM Europe TO AMERICA.

    Fox News=Wrong on many levels. “Fair & Balanced” my arse.

  2. @Jean, I loathe Fox News as much as the next open-minded intellectual, but they actually got the story right on this one. Columbus has been linked to the Naples Syphilis outbreak of 1495 since scientists first started understanding infectious diseases.

  3. Syphilis is easy to cure in its early stages. Signs and symptoms of syphilis include a firm, round, small, and painless sore on the genitals, anus, or mouth, or a rash on the body, especially on the palms of the hands or the soles of the feet.*’;’

    Ciao <

Leave a Reply